MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of autological bone marrow aspirate concentrate and platelete-rich plasma injected intraosseously in the treatment of the knee osteoarthritis

2023· article· en· W4367315248 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vladimir V. Kondrashenko, Dmitry A. Malanin, В. Д. Сикилинда, Andrey I. Gorbatenko, Maxim V. Demeshchenko, В. Н. Перфилова, Natalia O. Kostyanaya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Volgograd State Medical University · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACOsteoarthritisMedicineVisual analogue scalePlatelet-rich plasmaRandomized controlled trialSurgeryInternal medicinePhysical therapyPlateletPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), administered intraosseously to patients with stage IIIII knee osteoarthritis (OA) according to the Kellgren Lawrence (K-L) classification. Materials and methods: 40 patients were recruited and divided into 2 groups for the multicenter randomized study. Patients in the main group (n = 19) underwent a single intraosseous BMAC injection, and those in the comparison group (n = 21) had a similar procedure, but with the use of PRP. Treatment results were assessed at follow-up after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the verbal patient satisfaction scale (VSS), visual analog scale (VAS), WOMAC index (Western Ontario and MCMaster Universities osteoarthritis index), and Leken. Results: Estimated effectiveness of the application according to VSS from 1 to 6 months of observation, the opinions of patients were intercepted in the direction of BMAC (up to 65% of positive reviews) in the detection of PRP (up to 55 % of positive reviews). However, during the period of 6 to 12 months of observation we did not get significant results. Interpretation of the application of the VAS scale indicated a pronounced decrease of pain in both groups of patients. However, in the PRP group pain scores were higher. Analysis of the treatment results according to the WOMAC scale allows us to identify significant differences at all periods of observation with the prevalence of results in the BMAC group. Evaluation of the efficacy of therapy according to the Leken index indicated a more than twofold decrease in the index in the first month of observation. Subsequently, we noticed insignificant negative dynamic up to the 12th month of observation. When checking data between groups, the statistical data was significantly better in BMAC group. Conclusion. A single intraosseous injection of BMAC has an advantage at all control periods of observation in comparison with a similar injection of PRP. Both treatments do not cause serious complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Volgograd State Medical UniversitySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207