Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Vol. 38, No. 1 (March 2011)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABLE OF CONTENTS PROTECTING OLDER WORKERS: THE FAILURE OF THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967 - Jessica Z. Rothenberg and Daniel S. Gardner ATTITUDES, BEHAVIOR, AND SOCIAL PRACTICE - Harris Chaiklin SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? WHY APPLICANTS LEAVE THE EXTENDED WELFARE APPLICATION PROCESS - Marci Ybarra U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S WELL-BEING: THE IMPACT OF POLICY SHIFTS - David K. Androff, Cecilia Ayón, David Becerra, Maria Gurrola, Lorraine Salas, Judy Krysik, Karen Gerdes, and Elizabeth Segal ANALYZING THE POVERTY REDUCTION EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CANADIAN PROVINCES: DO POLITICAL PARTIES MATTER? - Robert D. Weaver, Nazim Habivov, and Lida Fan THE DIFFERENTIATED IMPACT OF BRIDGING AND BONDING SOCIAL CAPITAL ON ECONOMIC WELLBEING: AN INDIVIDUAL LEVEL PERSPECTIVE - Saijun Zhang, Steven. G. Anderson, and Min Zhan INABEL BURNS LINDSAY: SOCIAL WORK PIONEER CONTRIBUTOR TO PRACTICE AND EDUCATION THROUGH A SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE - Annie Woodley Brown, Ruby Morton Gourdine, and Sandra Edmonds Crewe SURVIVING THE EARLY YEARS OF THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND WORK OPPORTUNITY RECONCILIATION ACT - Joyce Bialik BOOK REVIEWS The Uses of Pessimism: A Review Essay. The Uses of Pessimism and the Danger of False Hope. Roger Scruton. Reviewed by Paul Adams. Social Work and Social Development: Theories and Skills for Developmental Social Work. James Midgley & Amy Conley, Eds. Reviewed by Margaret Lombe. A Dream Deferred: How Social Work Lost its Way and What Can Be Done. David Stoesz, Howard Jacob Karger, and Terry Carrilio. Reviewed by Michael Reisch. The New Jim Crow in the Age of Colorblindness. Michelle Alexander. Reviewed by Marguerite G. Rosenthal. Myth of the Social Volcano: Perceptions of Inequality and Distributive Injustice in Contemporary China. Martin King Whyte. Reviewed by Richard Levy. Contesting Development: Critical Struggles for Social Change. Philip McMichael, Ed. Reviewed by Andrew Gibbs. Economic Sociology: A Systematic Inquiry. Alejandro Portes. Reviewed by Eric Cheney.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".