Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Vol. 43, No. 3 (September 2016)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Title of Contents: INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM - Richard K. Caputo and Michael Lewis REIMAGINING EQUITY AND EGALITARIANISM: THE BASIC INCOME DEBATE IN AUSTRALIA - Jennifer Mays and Greg Marston NEXT STEPS ON THE ROAD TO BASIC INCOME IN CANADA - James P. Mulvale and Sid Frankel PROSPECTS FOR A UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME IN NEW ZEALAND Keith Rankin LESSONS FROM SWEDEN: SOLIDARITY, THE WELFARE STATE, AND BASIC INCOME - Almaz Zelleke BASIC INCOME GUARANTEE: THE GENDER IMPACT WITHIN HOUSEHOLDS - Sara Cantillon and Caitlin McLean SUSU: CAPITALIZING DEVELOPMENT FROM THE BOTTOM UP - David Stoesz, Isabella Gitau, Richard Rodriguez, and Frank Thompson FRIENDS OR FOES: THE IMPACT OF POLITICAL IDEOLOGY AND IMMIGRANT FRIENDS ON ANTI-IMMIGRANT SENTIMENT - Elizabeth Kiehne and Cecilia Ayón THE BURDEN OF COLONIAL DEBT AND INDEBTEDNESS IN SECOND GENERATION FILIPINO AMERICAN FAMILIES - Maria J. Ferrera Book Reviews Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy. S. M. Amadae. Reviewed by James Midgley Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender and Sexuality. Lal Zimman, Jenny Davis and Joshua Raclaw (Eds.). Reviewed by Sherri Shimansky Black Male Violence In Perspective: Toward Afrocentric Intervention. P. Tony Jackson. Reviewed by Husain Lateef Life In and Against the Odds: Debts of Freedom and the Speculative Roots of U.S. Culture. Heidi Hoechst. Reviewed by Cindy Vang The Dynamic Welfare State. David Stoesz. Review by Daniel Liechty
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".