PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI, PENEMPATAN KARYAWAN DAN PEMBINAAN KARIER TERHADAP PRESTASI KERJA KARYAWAN (Studi Pada Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah (BPRS) Bhakti Sumekar Wilayah Kerja Kabupaten Pamekasan)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This research was conducted at the Sharia Community Financing Bank (BPRS) Bhakti Sumekar Sumenep. The purpose of this study are: 1) To describe communication, employee placement and employee career development at the Syariah People's Financing Bank (BPRS) Bhakti Sumekar, Pamekasan Regency Working Area. 2) To find out and test the effect of communication, employee placement and career coaching simultaneously on employee work performance at the Sharia Community Financing Bank (BPRS) Bhakti Sumekar Pamekasan Regency Work Area. 3) To find out and test the influence of communication, employee placement and career coaching partially on employee work performance at the Islamic People's Financing Bank (BPRS) Bhakti Sumekar Pamekasan Regency Work Area. Analysis of data using SPSS, this type of research is explanatory research using quantitative research approaches. Keywords: Communication (X1), Placement of employees (X2), Coaching career (X3) and Work achievement (Y).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".