MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367551791 · doi:10.37232/sp.1987.4.6

Konkubinat w świetle prawa państw kapitalistycznych

2023· article· pl· W4367551791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrzej Szlęzak

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Prawnicze / The Legal Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohabitationFamily lawCommon lawMarriage lawLawComparative lawPolitical scienceLegislationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bibliografia Adamski F., Socjologia małżeństwa i rodziny. Wprowadzenie, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1982. Agell A., Cohabitation Without Marriage in Swedish Law [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980. Agell A., The Swedish Legislation on Marriage and Cohabitation. A Journey Without a Destination, „Scandinavian Studies in Law” 1980, t. 24. Astor H., Nothdurft J., Report of the New South Wales Law Reform Commission on De Facto Relationships, „The Modern Law Review” 1985, t. 48, nr 1. Blumberg G.G., Cohabitation Without Marriage. A Different Perspective, „UCLA Law Review” 1981, t. 28, nr 6. Bromley P.M., Family Law, Butterworths, London 1981. Bruch C.S., Nonmarital Cohabitation in the Common Law Countries. A Study in Judicial- Legislative Interaction, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1981, t. 29, nr 2. Bruch C.S., Property Rights of De Facto Spouses Including Thoughts on the Value of Homemaker’s Services, „Family Law Quarterly” 1976, t. 10. Caudill D.S., Legal Recognition of Unmarried Cohabitation. A Proposal to Update and Reconsider Common-Law Marriage, „Tennessee Law Review” 1982, t. 49, nr 3. Crutchfield Ch., Nonmarital Relationships and Their Impact on the Institution of Marriage and the Traditional Family Structure, „Journal of Family Law” 1980/81, t. 19. Deech R.L., The Case Against Legal Recognition of Cohabitation, „The International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 1980, t. 29. Fox D.W., The Role of Constructive, Implied and Resulting Trusts in Domestic Property Disputes, „Family Law” 1980, t. 10. Frank R., The Status of Cohabitation in the Legal Systems of West Germany and Other West European Countries, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1985, t. XXXIII, nr 2. Giron D.A., Domestic Relations - Cohabitation Not Grounds for Alimony Modification Absent Showing of Recipient’s Reduced Financial Need, „Suffolk University Law Review” 1981, t. 15, nr 5. Glendon M.A., The New Family and the New Property, Butterworths, Toronto 1981. Graue E.D., Cohabitation Without Marriage as a Problem of Law and Legislative Policy in West Germany and other Codified Systms [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980. Grossen J.M., Aspects of de facto Marriage under Switzerland’s Private Law [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980. Huet-Weiller D., L’union libre (La cohabitation sans mariage), „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1981, t. XXIX, nr 2. J.O.T., Alimony, Cohabitation and the Wages of Sin. A Statutory Analysis, „Alabama Law Review” 1982, t. 33, nr 3. Kaska S.B., Iowa Unmarried Cohabitants Denied Recovery for Loss of Consortium, „Iowa Law Review” 1984, t. 69. Lipp M., Die nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft und das burgerliche Recht. Eine dogmatisch-methodische Studie, „Archiv fur die civilistische Praxis” 1980, t. 180, z. 6. Maede D., Consortium Rights of the Unmarried - Time for a Reappraisal, „Family Law Quarterly” 1981, t. XV, nr 3. Mazeaud H., Mazeaud L., Mazeaud J., Chabas F., Lecons de droit civil, Obligations. Theorie generale, t. II, cz. 1, Montchrestien, Paris 1985. Mendel E.V., Custody and the Cohabitating Parent, „Journal of Family Law” 1981-1982, t. 20, nr 4. Meulders-Klein M.T., Cohabitation and Children in Europe, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1981, t. XXIX, nr 2. Müller-Freienfels W., Familienrecht im In- und Ausland. Aufsätze, Verlag für Standesamtswesen, Frankfurt 1986. Nerson R., Les couples non marlies en France [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980. Oldham J.T., Caudill D.S., A Reconnaissance of Public Policy Restrictions upon Enforcement of Contracts between Cohabitants, „Family Law Quarterly” 1984, t. XVIII, nr 1. Oldham J.T., Cohabitation by an Alimony Recipient Revisited, „Journal of Family Law” 1981-1982, t. 20, nr 4. Pearl D., Cohabitation in English Social Security and Supplementary Benefits Legislation, „Family Law” 1979, nr 9. Pearl D., The Legal Implications of a Relationship Outside Marriage, „Cambridge Law Journal” 1978, t. 37, nr 2. Peyrard G., Les couples non maries [w:] R. Nerson (red.), Mariage et famille en question, t. 1, Paris 1978. Rubellin-Devichi J., L’attitude du legislateur contemporain face au mariage de fait, „Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil” 1984, nr 3. Samuels A., The Mistress and the Law, „Family Law” 1976, t. 6. Schneider C.E., Moral Discourse rand the Transformation of American Family Law, „Michigan Law Review” 1985, t. 83. Schwarz-Libermann von Wahlendorf H.A. (red.), Mariage et familie en question, Ed. du CNRS, Lyon 1980. Tyszka Z., Socjologia rodziny, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1979. Weitzman L.J., The Marriage Contract. Spouses, Lovers and the Law, Free Press, London 1981. Weyrauch W.O., Metamorphoses of Marriage, „Family Law Quarterly” 1980, t. 13, nr 4. Wiel van de A.M., Cohabitation Outside Marriage in Dutch Law [w:] J. M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980. Wolk B., Federal Tax Consequences of Wealth Transfers Between Unmarried Cohabitants, „UCLA Law Review” 1980, t. 27, nr 6. Woods G., Loss of Consortium. Extending Recovery to Unmarried Couples in Texas, „Baylor Law Review” 1983, t. 35, nr 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Prawnicze / The Legal StudiesSame topicConflict of Laws and JurisdictionFrench-language works237,207