MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367597475 · doi:10.1161/svin.122.000748

Prediction of 90‐Day Home Time Among Patients With Medium‐Vessel Occlusion Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy

2023· article· en· W4367597475 on OpenAlexaff
Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Nima Kashani, MacKenzie Horn, Jillian Stang, Andrew M. Demchuk, Michael D. Hill, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Jessalyn K. Holodinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of ManitobaFoothills Medical CentreAlberta HealthUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisOcclusionStroke (engine)Middle cerebral arteryStenosisPosterior cerebral arterySurgeryIschemiaRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The benefit of endovascular thrombectomy for medium-vessel occlusion (MeVO) strokes is unclear. We used 90-day home time to explore outcomes in patients with MeVO versus large-vessel occlusions treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Methods: Data are from the QuICR (Quality Improvement and Clinical Research) provincial stroke registry and linked administrative data to identify patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy in our center from January 2015 to December 2020. Imaging data were scored by 2-physician consensus. We defined MeVO as occlusion beyond and including M2-middle cerebral artery, A2-anterior cerebral artery, or P2-posterior cerebral artery segments. Successful reperfusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral ischemia grades (≥2b/3). The primary outcome was patient home time (the number of nights a patient is back at their premorbid living situation without an increase in level of care within 90 days of the stroke) using random forest regression. Covariate contribution to home time was determined using partial dependence plots. Results: Among 663 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy, 139 (20.9%) had MeVO (median age, 71 years; 50.4% women; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 16). The majority (82%) had good pial collaterals, 10.4% had a tandem extracranial carotid occlusion or stenosis, and 41.7% received intravenous thrombolysis. The most common site of occlusion was M2-middle cerebral artery (58.3%). One hundred eighteen (86.7%) patients achieved successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia grades ≥2b/3). Using partial dependence plots, the mean predicted home times were similar in patients with MeVO (45.5 days) versus large-vessel occlusions (44.6 days). Factors predicting lower 90-day home time in patients with MeVOs were diabetes (-8.7 days), hypertension (-6.5 days), and atrial fibrillation (-3.5 days). There was no meaningful difference in predicted 90-day home-time by sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, collateral grade, or thrombolysis. Conclusion: Patients with MeVO who are selected for endovascular therapy with similar demographic and clinical profiles to large-vessel occlusions can achieve similar 90-day home time outcomes to large-vessel occlusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207