MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367602680 · doi:10.1158/1557-3125.ras23-a022

Abstract A022: Translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) stimulates mutant KRAS function in cancer

2023· article· en· W4367602680 on OpenAlexaff
Hyungdong Kim, Nour Ghaddar, Laleh Ebrahimi Ghahnavieh, Shuo Wang, Kwang‐Jin Cho, Atsuo T. Sasaki, Antonis E. Koromilas

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKRASeIF2Integrated stress responseGuanine nucleotide exchange factorCell biologyBiologyTranslation (biology)MutantCancer researchSignal transductionCancerGeneticsMessenger RNAColorectal cancerGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract KRAS mutations appear with high frequency in colorectal, lung and pancreatic cancers, which are the three leading causes of new cancer deaths worldwide. Mutant KRAS is preferentially bound to GTP resulting in continuous cell proliferation. Mutant KRAS exposes cells to oncogenic forms of stress (i.e. genotoxic, metabolic, proteostatic stress), which disrupt proliferation and tissue homeostasis. To cope with stress, cells engage pro-adaptive mechanisms, which act in favor of mutant KRAS to transform cells. An important adaptation mechanism to stress acts at the level of mRNA translation and involves the functional interplay between the translation initiator factors eIF2 and eIF2B. Phosphorylated eIF2 mediates a translational and transcriptional reprogramming to promote adaptation under stress, a process that is antagonized by the guanine exchange function (GEF) of eIF2B. We demonstrate the physical interaction between mutant KRAS and eIF2B by mass spectrometry. Using genetic approaches, we show that eIF2B is required for the survival and proliferation of tumor cells with KRAS mutations via the stimulation of MAPK signaling. We also show that eIF2B contributes to increased resistance of tumor cells to pharmacological inhibition of mutant KRAS forms. Genetic inactivation of eIF2B promotes the formation of mutant KRAS-GDP complexes whereas its pharmacological stimulation facilitates mutant KRAS-GTP complex formation in tumor cells; this data supports a potential GEF function for eIF2B towards mutant KRAS. Cell imaging experiments provide strong evidence for the implication of eIF2B in the association of mutant KRAS with the plasma membrane of tumor cells. Our findings reveal a stimulatory role of eIF2B in mutant KRAS signaling and provide a previously unidentified link between mutant KRAS and mRNA translation with implications in the growth and treatment of cancers with KRAS mutations. Citation Format: Hyungdong Kim, Nour Ghaddar, Laleh Ebrahimi Ghahnavieh, Shuo Wang, Kwang-Jin Cho, Atsuo Sasaki, Antonis E. Koromilas. Translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) stimulates mutant KRAS function in cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Targeting RAS; 2023 Mar 5-8; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2023;21(5_Suppl):Abstract nr A022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207