MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367603204 · doi:10.4000/anabases.16140

Giuseppe La Bua et Francesca Romana Berno, Cicero and Roman Education: the Reception of the Speeches and Ancient Scholarship

2023· article· en· W4367603204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnabases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Philology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiceroArtHumanitiesPhilosophyClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La réception de Cicéron est marquée tant par l’admiration pour son éloquence que par la réprobation de son jeu politique et de son manque de constantia. Portraying Cicero met l’accent sur les divers portraits du personnage de Cicéron comme orateur républicain en examinant son influence comme prosateur modèle icône de la latinitas et son rôle dans la pensée politique et philosophique. La première partie relie les autoportraits de Cicéron à leur contexte d’énonciation et à leur public. Casament...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it