Measuring Coverage of Essential Maternal Postnatal Care Services in the Squatter Settlements of Islamabad Capital Territory in Pakistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the coverage of essential postnatal maternal care services among women residing in the slums of Islamabad. A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the coverage of essential postnatal care (PNC) services. Using random sampling, 416 women living in the squatter settlements of Islamabad Capital Territory were selected as study participants. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 22. Descriptive statistics were employed to display frequencies for categorical variables, whereas mean, median, and standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables. The analysis of data showed that 93.5 percent of the women utilized postnatal services at least once after delivery. Approximately 9 percent and 4 percent of women received all eight recommended services within 24 h of birth and beyond 24 h of birth, respectively. Effective PNC services were received by only 1 percent of the women. The study revealed that the utilization of effective PNC was very low. The majority of the women delivered in health institutions and received their first PNC checkups, but follow-up for the recommended checkups was very low. These results can help health professionals and policymakers in designing programs and developing efficient strategies that would improve PNC service utilization in Pakistan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".