Histological Assessment of Selenium Protective Effect Against Diclofenac Sodium-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a matter of global significance, with widespread implications for human health. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as Diclofenac Sodium, are widely used but have been associated with numerous adverse effects, including those on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidney. Selenium, an essential element in mammalian biology, has demonstrated antioxidant properties that enable it to antagonize the effects of free radicals. The present study aimed to investigate the potential protective effect of Selenium against Diclofenac Sodium-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. The study sample consisted of 32 male albino Wistar rats and was randomly divided into 4 groups: Control group, Diclofenac group (Dic group) (administered at a dose of 50 mg/kg I.M., for 3 days), Selenium group (Se group) (administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg I.P., for 8 days), and Diclofenac plus Selenium group (Dic + Se group). Rats were sacrificed on the 9th day. The results were analyzed with a significance level of p<0.05. The findings revealed significant tubular and glomerular injuries in the Diclofenac group compared to the control group. However, there was no statistically significant improvement observed in the Dic + Se group. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that Selenium affords partial protection against Diclofenac Sodium-induced nephrotoxicity, but it is not sufficient to provide complete protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".