How have organizations attempted to help the Inuit sustain their post-colonization economy, and have they been effective?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
European colonization of the Inuit in Arctic Canada has left a long-lasting legacy in the economies of present-day Canadian first nation communities. The long-term sustainability of the Inuit economy is becoming an ever-present issue. This research explores the ways in which multiple organizations have helped the Inuit sustain their post-colonization economy and their effectiveness in doing so. It focuses on the case of the territory of Nunavut, which has been subject to various policies and efforts to ensure the sustainability of the economy in the long term.. Policy analysis was utilized to draw conclusions from Nunavut and Canadian government policy reports as well as reports that grassroots Inuit organizations have produced. The evidence in this research suggests that governments have been partially successful in creating a sustainable economy through providing employment opportunities and spearheading mining development for the Inuit, but that their policies often encroach upon Inuit traditional values and belief systems amidst their attempted efforts to mitigate those harms. Grassroots organizations, on the other hand, have created a positive and connected environment within the Inuit community by upholding Inuit traditional values, which has been effective in sustaining the Inuit post-colonization economy. Further research and action are necessary to glean further empirical data to measure the precise negative or positive impacts of the policies and initiatives that both the government and grassroots organizations have directed for the Inuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".