MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368282645 · doi:10.5751/jfo-00264-940205

South Atlantic Bight – a final stop for Ruddy Turnstones migrating to the Arctic

2023· article· en· W4368282645 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Felicia J. Sanders, Adam Smith, Janet M. Thibault, Deborah Carter, Maina Handmaker, Fletcher M. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Ornithology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthBird Studies CanadaNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources
KeywordsGeographyArcticFisheryHabitatThe arcticEcologyOceanographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migratory stopover sites are of high conservation concern especially those sites where shorebirds concentrate in large numbers to acquire fat reserves to fuel continued flight to breeding grounds. Many shorebirds use only a few stopover sites during northward migration to Arctic breeding grounds, thus identifying important locations, migration chronology, and flight routes are priority research topics to inform effective management strategies. We examined Ruddy Turnstones (<em>Arenaria interpres</em>) route and timing to Arctic breeding grounds from an island in South Carolina in the heart of the South Atlantic Bight using the Motus Wildlife Tracking System. Ruddy Turnstones leaving South Carolina did not migrate northward up the Atlantic coast but migrated inland through the Great Lakes Basin. Most Ruddy Turnstones did not make a stop in the Great Lakes Basin, thus making South Carolina the last presumed stopover before reaching Arctic habitats. Like other shorebird migration studies, most of the Ruddy Turnstones made use of tailwinds at departure and ground speeds were positively correlated with tailwind support. Future conservation planning for Ruddy Turnstones must consider the varied migratory routes and strategies of this declining shorebird species. This research also demonstrates the usefulness of Motus for tracking the movement of smaller shorebirds and the potential for strategic expansion of the Motus network to understand their full life cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Field OrnithologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207