MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368359786 · doi:10.1097/mca.0000000000001247

Anomalous circumflex artery: a benign variant generating a malignant potential after valve surgery

2023· review· en· W4368359786 on OpenAlexaff
Nikolaos A. Papakonstantinou, Evangelos Leontiadis, Sotirios D. Katsaridis, Michael Milonakis, Dimitrios V. Avgerinos, Kyrillos Papadopoulos, Ioannis Malakos, Georgios T. Stavridis

Bibliographic record

VenueCoronary Artery Disease · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineCircumflexArteryMyocardial infarctionRevascularizationSinus (botany)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery anomalies are a diverse group of congenital disorders presenting with highly variable clinical manifestations. The anomalous origin of left circumflex artery from the right coronary sinus following a retro-aortic trajectory is a well-recognized anatomic variation. Despite its benign course, it can prove lethal in association with valvular surgery. When single aortic valve replacement or combined with mitral valve replacement is performed, the aberrant coronary vessel may be compressed by or between the prosthetic rings triggering postoperative lateral myocardial ischemia. If left untreated, the patient is at risk of sudden death or myocardial infarction with its detrimental complications. Skeletonization and mobilization of the aberrant coronary artery is the most widely accepted intervention, but valve downsizing or concomitant surgical or transcatheter revascularization have also been described. However, large series are lacking from the literature. Therefore, no guidelines exist. This study is a thorough review of the literature concerning the aforementioned anomaly in association with valvular surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCoronary Artery DiseaseSame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207