MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368364950 · doi:10.1002/aenm.202300147

High‐Entropy Surface Complex Stabilized LiCoO<sub>2</sub> Cathode

2023· article· en· W4368364950 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xinghua Tan, Yongxin Zhang, Shenyang Xu, Peihua Yang, Tongchao Liu, Dongdong Mao, Jimin Qiu, Zhefeng Chen, Zhaoxia Lu, Feng Pan, Weiguo Chu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Energy Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArgonne National LaboratorySoft Science Research Project of Guangdong ProvinceOffice of ScienceBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of ChicagoOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrolyteDopingCathodeDopantElectrochemistryChemical engineeringThermal stabilityVoltageChemical physicsElectrodeNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Elevating the charge voltage of LiCoO 2 increases the energy density of batteries, which is highly enticing in energy storage implementation ranging from portable electronics to e‐vehicles. However, hybrid redox reactions at high voltages facilitate oxygen evolution, electrolyte decomposition and irreversible phase change, and accordingly lead to rapid battery capacity decay. Here significantly improved high‐voltage cycling stability of Mg‐Al‐Eu co‐doped LiCoO 2 is demonstrated. It is found that element co‐doping induces a near‐surface high‐entropy zone, including an innately thin disordered rock‐salt shell and a dopant segregation surface. The high‐entropy complex can effectively suppress oxygen evolution and near‐surface structure deconstruction. The phase change reversibility between O3 and H1‐3 and thermal stability of the cathode are greatly enhanced as well. As a result, the co‐doped LiCoO 2 exhibits a remarkable cycling performance, retaining 86.3% and 72.0% of initial capacity over 800 and 2000 cycles, respectively, with a high cut‐off voltage of 4.6 V. The feasible co‐doping approach broadens the perspective for the development of stable lithium‐ion batteries with high operating voltages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Energy MaterialsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207