Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clink Charity works alongside Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) to reduce prison recidivism by ‘changing attitudes, transforming lives, and creating second chances’ for those who are in prison or in the process of re-entering society. The charity and HMPPS run four prison-based restaurants together, which are open to the public. These are: The Clink Restaurant at HMP High Down, which was the first to open in May 2009; The Clink at HMP Cardiff, open since 2012; The Clink at HMP Brixton, 2014; and The Clink HMP Styal, since January 2020. Each of these are registered catering colleges and help serving prisoners to gain their City and Guild National Vocational Qualifications in hospitality and horticulture; the idea behind it is that this will help them with employment post-release. Considering that the hospitality sector as of 2019 dealt with a major skills deficit (Harkinson and Moore, 2019) the Clink went some way in alleviating the pressure. Nevertheless, consumer spending as of May 2021 is at less than 70% of the pre-pandemic levels, remaining at a one quarter lower than 2019 (Office for National Statistics, 2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".