Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clink Charity works alongside Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) to reduce prison recidivism by ‘changing attitudes, transforming lives, and creating second chances’ for those who are in prison or in the process of re-entering society. The charity and HMPPS run four prison-based restaurants together, which are open to the public. These are: The Clink Restaurant at HMP High Down, which was the first to open in May 2009; The Clink at HMP Cardiff, open since 2012; The Clink at HMP Brixton, 2014; and The Clink HMP Styal, since January 2020. Each of these are registered catering colleges and help serving prisoners to gain their City and Guild National Vocational Qualifications in hospitality and horticulture; the idea behind it is that this will help them with employment post-release. Considering that the hospitality sector as of 2019 dealt with a major skills deficit (Harkinson and Moore, 2019) the Clink went some way in alleviating the pressure. Nevertheless, consumer spending as of May 2021 is at less than 70% of the pre-pandemic levels, remaining at a one quarter lower than 2019 (Office for National Statistics, 2021). While ‘prison fine-dining’ may come across as oxymoronic to some readers, a short study of TripAdvisor customer reviews of the Clink Restaurants will show that customers rate these as some of the best restaurants in their cities of residence (Gebbels et al, 2021). For example, Brixton ranked 20th out of 16,740 restaurants in London; Cardiff – 9th of 118; Styal 1st of 71 restaurants in Wilmslow; and High Down ranked 1st of 126 restaurants in Sutton.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.288 | 0.123 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".