Bibliographic record
Abstract
Next article FreeCoverPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreCover: Jessica Whitbread and Morgan M Page (Odofemi), Space Date—Bedroom 1. Photo: Tania Anderson.Space Dates is a collaborative project by Canadian queer artist-activists Jessica Whitbread and Morgan M Page (Odofemi) focused on interrogating, in often hilarious and surreal ways, the intersection of the criminalization of HIV nondisclosure, the “safer sex industrial complex,” and queer women’s sexualities. The project centers on the visual theme of two women in spacesuits going on cute dates and attempting to have so-safe-you-can’t-even-feel-it sex with each other.Space Date—“Picnic” was first performed as part of a Day With(out) Art at the Art Gallery of Ontario in 2012 as an extension of the PosterVIRUS collaboration with Onya Hogan-Finaly on I DON’T NEED TO WEAR A SPACE SUIT TO FUCK YOU! “Eating Out” was performed at Rats 9 Gallery in Montreal (2013).© 2012 by Jessica Whitbread and Morgan M Page (Odofemi). Permission to reprint may be obtained only from the artists. Next article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 48, Number 3Spring 2023 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/723463 © The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.961 | 0.928 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".