MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372185448 · doi:10.55275/jposna-2023-712

Major Cobb Angle Did Not Decrease in 92% of Patients After Vertebral Body Tethering Surgery Following First Erect Radiograph

2023· article· en· W4372185448 on OpenAlexaff
Tiffany N. Phan, Tishya A.L. Wren, Michael J. Heffernan, Firoz Miyanji, Stefan Parent, Michelle C. Welborn, David L. Skaggs, Kenneth D. Illingworth, Lindsay M. Andras

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetheringVertebral bodyCobBRadiographyCobb angleMedicineOrthodonticsSurgeryAnatomyBiologyCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Much enthusiasm has been generated around vertebral body tethering (VBT) as an alternative to fusion treatment. However, the majority of series report little difference between Cobb angles on the first erect post-operative x-ray and final follow-up, suggesting VBT is not consistently modulating spine growth in a way that significantly affects Cobb Angle. Methods: All AIS patients who underwent VBT with > 2 yrs follow-up between December 2013 and January 2020 in a multi-center registry were reviewed. Change in Cobb angle was calculated by subtracting the Cobb angle at final follow-up from that on first erect postoperative radiographs. A change in Cobb angle ≤5° was considered within normal measurement variability. Results: There were a total of 113 patients who met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 12.9 yrs (SD 1.3) and a mean follow-up of 3.7 yrs (range: 2.0 to 6.8). A mean of 6.6 levels were tethered. Preoperative mean major Cobb angle was 51.1°(range: 32° to 75°), which corrected to a mean major Cobb of 27.4° (range: 10° to 53°) on first erect radiographs. At final follow-up, the mean major Cobb was 31.1°(range: -50° to 69°). 50.4% (57/113) of curves were stable (Cobb angles within 5° of their first erect radiograph on final follow-up). A total of 41.6% (n=47) had > 5° of increase in Cobb angle following the initial erect radiograph. 8% (n=9) showed more than 5° of decrease in Cobb angle during the follow-up period, and 4.4% (n=5) had greater than 10° of correction. 2 of those 5 patients that corrected more than 10° overcorrected, ending up with 30° and 50° curves in the opposite direction. Conclusion: Although this technique holds promise and many of the curves remained stable from first erect to final follow up (50%), only 9/113 VBT patients in this series demonstrated improvement in Cobb angle over time following first erect imaging, including 2 patients that overcorrected. Further research is needed to identify the differentiating factors between those patients that progressed, didn't progress, or overcorrected to determine which patients are more likely to benefit from VBT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North AmericaSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207