Second-Order Nonlinear Optics as an Orientation-Independent Probe of Molecular Environments at Interfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measurement techniques that probe the second-order susceptibility, such as second-harmonic and sum-frequency generation, are recognized for their ability to study environments with broken centrosymmetry. As a result, they serve as reporters of molecules at surfaces because the second-order susceptibility is often zero in the adjacent bulk media. Although the signals measured in such experiments carry unique information about the interfacial environment, the challenge is to disentangle properties related to the electronic structure as they are wrapped up in the orientation distribution. Over the past 30 years, this challenge has been turned into an opportunity, as many studies have sought to learn about the arrangement of molecules at surfaces. Here we demonstrate that the flipped case is possible, where fundamental properties of the interfacial environment can be extracted in a manner that is completely independent of, and therefore oblivious to, the orientation distribution. Using p -cyanophenol adsorbed at the air–water interface as an example, we illustrate that the cyano group polarizability varies less along the direction of the C–N bond when at the surface than when the same molecules are in the bulk aqueous phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".