MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Switching Kronecker Product Linear Filtering for Multispeaker Adaptive Speech Dereverberation

2023· article· en· W4372265900 on OpenAlexaff
Gongping Huang, Jacob Benesty, Israel Cohen, Emil Winebrand, Jingdong Chen, Walter Kellermann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsKronecker productComputer scienceLinear predictionSpeech recognitionReverberationKronecker deltaFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dereverberation, a process to mitigate or eliminate the reverberation effect, plays an important role in hands-free speech communication and human-machine interfaces. Tremendous efforts have been devoted to this problem and various methods have been developed over the last three decades. Those methods generally assume that there is only a single speaker in the acoustic environment and, consequently, they suffer from significant performance degradation if multiple speakers participate in the conversation. How to deal with reverberation in multiple-speaker scenarios is still a challenging problem, which is studied in this work. We present a switching multichannel linear prediction filtering method, which designs multiple linear filters with each tracking one speaker. When some speaker is active, the corresponding filter and the weighted cross-correlation matrix are updated while the other filters are kept unchanged. To further improve the performance and reduce complexity, we apply the Kronecker product to decompose every linear prediction filter into a Kronecker product of two shorter filters: one is time-invariant and the other is time-varying. The former is estimated with a batch method (using only a few seconds of speech signal when the corresponding speaker starts to talk in the entire conversation) while a recursive least-squares algorithm is derived for identifying the time-varying set of Kronecker filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207