Phenotype Genotype Characterization of <i>FKRP</i> -related Muscular Dystrophy among Indian Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phenotypic spectrum of Fukutin-related protein (FKRP) mutations is highly variable and comprises of limb girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) R9 (previously LGMD 2I) and FKRP related congenital muscular dystrophies. OBJECTIVE: To identify the distinct genotype phenotype pattern in Indian patients with FKRP gene mutations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case files of patients with muscular dystrophy having a genetically confirmed FKRP mutation. All patients had undergone genetic testing using next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Our patients included five males and four females presenting between 1.5 years and seven years of age (median age - 3 years). The initial symptom was a delayed acquisition of gross motor developmental milestones in seven patients and recurrent falls and poor sucking in one patient each. Two patients had a language delay, with both having abnormalities on the brain MRI. Macroglossia, scapular winging, and facial weakness were noted in one, three and four patients respectively. Calf muscle hypertrophy was seen in eight patients and ankle contractures in six. At the last follow-up, three patients had lost ambulation (median age - 7 years; range 6.5-9 years) and three patients had not attained independent ambulation. Creatine kinase levels ranged between 2793 and 32,396 U/L (mean 12,120 U/L). A common mutation - c.1343C>T was noted in 5 patients in our cohort. Additionally, four novel mutations were identified. Overall, six patients had an LGMD R9 phenotype, and three had a congenital muscular dystrophy phenotype. CONCLUSION: Patients with FKRP mutations can have varied presentations. A Duchenne-like phenotype was the most commonly encountered pattern in our cohort, with c.1343C>T being the most common mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".