MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372283207 · doi:10.3233/jnd-230017

MYH2-related Myopathy: Expanding the Clinical Spectrum of Chronic Progressive External Ophthalmoplegia (CPEO)

2023· article· en· W4372283207 on OpenAlexaff
Dipti Baskar, Seena Vengalil, Saraswati Nashi, Mainak Bardhan, Kosha Srivastava, Sai Bhargava Sanka, Kiran Polavarapu, Deepak Menon, Veeramani Preethish‐Kumar, Hansashree Padmanabha, Gautham Arunachal, Atchayaram Nalini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuromuscular Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic progressive external ophthalmoplegiaMedicineMyopathyPtosisExternal ophthalmoplegiaWeaknessKearns–Sayre syndromeProximal muscle weaknessCreatine kinaseMitochondrial myopathyInternal medicineAnatomyMuscle biopsySurgeryBiopsyMitochondrial DNAGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) is symptom complex with progressive ptosis and restricted ocular motility without diplopia. MYH2 myopathy is rare disorder presenting with CPEO and muscle weakness. We report two Indian patients of MYH2 myopathy with unique features. Patient-1 presented with early adult-onset esophageal reflux followed by, proximal lower limb weakness, proptosis, CPEO without ptosis. He had elevated creatine kinase along with characteristic muscle MRI findings of prominent semitendinosus and medial gastrocnemius involvement. Patient -2 presented with early adult onset CPEO without limb weakness. His creatine kinase was normal. Both the patients had novel MYH2 mutations: a homozygous 5'splice variation in intron 4 (c.348 + 2dup) in patient 1 and homozygous single base pair deletion in exon 32 (p. Ala1480ProfsTer11) in patient 2. Unique features noted include adult onset, isolated CPEO, proptosis, esophageal reflux disease and absence of skeletal abnormalities. MYH2 myopathy has to be considered in adult patients with CPEO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuromuscular DiseasesSame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207