MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4372328859 · doi:10.1029/2022jd038052

Exceptional Wildfire Enhancements of PAN, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>, CH<sub>3</sub>OH, and HCOOH Over the Canadian High Arctic During August 2017

2023· article· en· W4372328859 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tyler Wizenberg, Kimberly Strong, Dylan B. A. Jones, Erik Lutsch, Emmanuel Mahieu, Bruno Franco, Lieven Clarisse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersEurostarsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGovernment of CanadaOntario Innovation TrustBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeJet Propulsion LaboratoryCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
KeywordsAtmospheric sciencesPlumeFormic acidArcticEnvironmental scienceOzoneTroposphereAtmospheric chemistryMeteorologyClimatologyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsEnvironmental chemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extreme enhancements in the total columns of carbon monoxide (CO), peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), ethylene (C2H4), methanol (CH3OH), and formic acid (HCOOH) were observed over the Canadian high Arctic during the period of 17–22 August 2017 by a ground‐based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer at Eureka, Nunavut (80.05°N, 86.42°W), and by the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) satellite instruments. These enhancements have been attributed to wildfires in British Columbia (BC) and the Northwest Territories (NWT) of Canada, and represent the largest short‐term perturbations of PAN, C2H4, and HCOOH above ambient concentrations over the 14‐year (2006–2020) Eureka time‐series. Enhancement ratios, emission ratios, and emission factors relative to CO were calculated for all species for both FTIR and IASI observations. The C2H4 and HCOOH emission factors are significantly larger than previous studies, suggesting unusually high emissions from these fires. The wildfire plumes were also simulated using the GEOS‐Chem model. Initial GEOS‐Chem simulations displayed a severe under‐estimation relative to observations for these fire plumes resulting from the injection height scheme of the model. Sensitivity tests highlighted that injection heights of 12.5 km for BC (based on previous studies) and 10 km for the NWT fires yielded the strongest correlations with ground‐based measurements. Applying these injection heights to the model significantly improves the simulated plume transport and agreement with ground‐ and space‐based observations. GEOS‐Chem was also used to estimate the magnitude of secondary in‐plume production of CH3OH and HCOOH; it was found to be an important component (∼18%) of the enhanced HCOOH columns at Eureka.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→