MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372352887 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.180214

Spatial Distribution of Dryland Forest on Water Availability in Kumaligon Watershed Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

2023· article· en· W4372352887 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Akhbar Akhbar, Naharuddin Naharuddin, Rahmat Kurniadi, Adam Malik, Sudirman Daeng Massiri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Tadulako
KeywordsWatershedSpatial distributionGeographyDistribution (mathematics)AgroforestryEnvironmental scienceForestryHydrology (agriculture)GeologyRemote sensingMathematicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kumaligon Watershed in Buol Regency, Central Sulawesi Province is located in a groundwater basin with an area of 1,488.77Ha.The region consists of karst hills and dryland forest cover with high water demand.This watershed is the main source of water for the community in fulfilling the needs of clean water, agriculture and tourism, so this research is important to do.Therefore, this study aims to determine the spatial distribution effect of dryland forest area on water availability in the Kumaligon Watershed.A spatialmeteorological method was used with an analytical approach to determine the distribution, while the Thornthwaite-Mather water balance analysis assessed the water availability.The result showed that dryland forest is concentrated in the upstream region of the karst hills with an area of 1,082.43Ha and water availability of 4,332.34m 3 /year.By comparing the water demand in 2021, namely, 1,218.75m 3 /year, a criticality index of 0.28 was obtained, which indicates that the condition of the region was not critical.Based on these findings, the dryland forests in the region are expected to still have an adequate supply of water in the next 25 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207