Jackfruit (Artocarpus Heterophyllus) Seed Starch with Sorbitol as a Plasticizer and Rosella Flower Antioxidant in the Making Edible Film (Hibiscus Sabdariffa)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A thin, biodegradable sheet of starch known as the edible film can be used to wrap food and is also suitable for consumption.In this work, sorbitol will be used as a plasticizer, and an antioxidant will be utilized to examine the physical and chemical characteristics of the jackfruit seed starch-based edible film.The results showed that the most successful therapy in this investigation was the edible jackfruit seed starch film with 3% (v/v) rosella flower extract.Its physical characteristics included 0.13 mm thickness, 147.62% water absorption, 30% solubility, and a speed of vapor transport of water of 0.6775 gram/hour m -2 .The shelf life of the edible film is six days at room temperature and seven days at cold temperatures.The edible film in this study can decompose, according to the biodegradability test, and the chemical characteristics obtained for pH 6.236 and according to the results of the FTIR tests, this study's method of producing edible film is a physical mixing procedure without the introduction of any additional groups.Having an IC50 of 165,496 ppm, it has antioxidant action within seven days.Other advantages of edible films that serve as food wrappers from the oxidation (antioxidant) process can be obtained by adding rosella flower extract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".