Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is a fine task to honour our predecessors, to recognize in Hermann Cohen's work a signal promise for the development of Jewish Philosophy in the 20th Century.However, in the essays you hold here we turn to the future and recover Cohen as a source, eine Quelle, for Philosophy in the 21st Century.While there has been a steady interest in Jewish Studies in Cohen's posthumous Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism, for several decades; the English speaking world has largely ignored Cohen.The reasons are tragic, reflecting not only the destruction of the German Jewish community, and also the claim of complete falsification of the 'German-Jewish symbiosis', but also the triumph of Heidegger and the claim to refute neo-Kantianism.But the result was silencing one of the great thinkers of the generation before World War I.The essays assembled here represent the leading Cohen scholars from the United States and Canada, and from Italy, Switzerland, Germany, the Netherlands, and Israel.The international nature of this collection points to the rising of a new generation with new interests in Cohen.It would be remiss to fail to notice the longstanding championing of Cohen's cause by Steven S. Schwarzschild (z'l), and the remarkable contribution of Helmut Holzhey and the Philosophical Seminar in Zürich, where many of the authors studied over the last twenty years.Emerging from their efforts is a new set of explorations both in Cohen's own system and also in his relation to a wide-range of subsequent thinkers.And it is to the system most of all that our attention is drawn in this set of essays, and to the center of the system, The Ethics of Pure Will.The various essays at the beginning of this volume will introduce Cohen's text better than I can in a few words here.Published first in 1904, and then in a second edition in 1907, the second volume of a three volume system, The Ethics is a bold restatement of Robert Gibbs -9789047410676
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".