MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375842599 · doi:10.3901/jme.2022.24.211

Dual Attention Network for the Classification of Road Surface Conditions Based on EfficientNet

2022· article· en· W4375842599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)Dual purposeEnvironmental scienceSurface (topology)Computer scienceEngineeringMathematicsArtGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

摘要: 针对现有EfficientNet模型应用于沥青路面状态分类时,卷积操作易导致高层特征信息丢失问题,在现有EfficientNet模型的深层结构中引入一种双注意力机制,包含通道注意力模块和位置注意力模块,借助Sigmoid线性单元(Sigmoid linear unit,SiLU)激活函数和余弦学习率衰减策略,提出一种融合双注意力机制EfficientNet (Dual attention network based on EfficientNet,DAEfficientNet)的沥青路面状态分类方法。首先,建立不同天气下5种沥青路面共5 938张图像作为数据集,积雪样本来自开源数据集(Canadian adverse driving conditions dataset,CADCD)。然后,对所提出模型进行训练,并得到沥青路面图像分类结果。最后,利用准确率(Accuracy)、精确率(Precision)、召回率(Recall)、F1 score和特异度(Specificity),将所提出模型与其他现有卷积神经网络模型进行分类效果对比分析。试验结果表明:所提出模型优于其他对比模型,能准确、有效地对不同天气下的沥青路面状态进行分类。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it