MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375853658 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000207370

Associations of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces With Brain Lesions, Brain Age, and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

2023· article· en· W4375853658 on OpenAlexafffund
Amelia J. Hicks, Benjamin Sinclair, Sandy R. Shultz, William Pham, Lisa C. Silbert, Daniel L. Schwartz, Christopher C. Rowe, Jennie Ponsford, Meng Law, Gershon Spitz

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryMedicineNeuropsychologyInternal medicinePediatricsCognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background and Objectives</h3> Enlarged perivascular spaces (ePVS) have been identified as a key signature of glymphatic system dysfunction in neurological conditions. The incidence and clinical implications of ePVS after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are not yet understood. We investigated whether individuals with chronic moderate-severe TBI had an increased burden of ePVS, and whether ePVS burden is modulated by the presence of focal lesions, older brain age, and poorer sleep quality. We examined whether increased burden of ePVS was associated with poorer cognitive and emotional outcomes. <h3>Methods</h3> Using a cross-sectional design, participants with a single moderate-severe chronic TBI (sustained ≥ 10 years ago) were recruited from an inpatient rehabilitation program. Control participants were recruited from the community. Participants underwent 3T brain MRI, neuropsychological assessment, and clinical evaluations. ePVS burden in white matter was quantified using automated segmentation. The relationship between number of ePVS, group membership, focal lesions, brain age, current sleep quality, and outcome was modelled using negative binomial and linear regressions. <h3>Results</h3> This study included 100 participants with TBI (70% male; <i>M</i> = 56.8 years), and 75 control participants (54.3% male; <i>M</i> = 59.8 years). The TBI group had a significantly greater burden of ePVS (prevalence ratio rate (<i>PRR</i>) = 1.29, <i>p</i> = 0.013, CI<sub>95%</sub> [1.05, 1.57]). The presence of bilateral lesions was associated with greater ePVS burden (<i>PRR</i> = 1.41, <i>p</i> = 0.021, CI<sub>95%</sub> [1.05, 1.90]). There was no association between ePVS burden, sleep quality (<i>PRR</i> = 1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.491, CI<sub>95%</sub> [0.98, 1.048]) and sleep duration (<i>PRR</i> = 1.03, <i>p</i> = 0.556, CI<sub>95%</sub> [0.92, 1.16]). ePVS was associated with verbal memory (β = -0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.006, CI<sub>95%</sub> [-0.72, -0.12]), but not with other cognitive domains. Burden of ePVS was not associated with emotional distress (β = -0.70, <i>p</i> = 0.461, CI<sub>95%</sub> [-2.57, 1.17) or brain age (<i>PRR</i> = 1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.665, CI<sub>95%</sub> [0.99, 1.02]). <h3>Discussion</h3> TBI is associated with a greater burden of ePVS, especially when there have been bilateral brain lesions. ePVS was associated with reduced verbal memory performance. ePVS may indicate ongoing impairments in glymphatic system function in the chronic post-injury period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207