MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375856276 · doi:10.1007/s11764-023-01388-z

Chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in female adolescent and young adults with Hodgkin’s lymphoma: reproductive health outcomes

2023· article· en· W4375856276 on OpenAlexaffabout
Susan Luong, Claire Mockler, Jessica Pudwell, Wenbin Li, Jill Dudebout, Maria P. Vélez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cancer Survivorship · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyPopulationChemotherapyInfertilityInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyPregnancyObstetricsGynecologyOncologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of Hodgkin's lymphoma and its treatment on reproductive health in female adolescent and young adults (AYA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based, matched-cohort study of female patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma diagnosed at 15-39 years of age from 1995 to 2014 in Ontario, Canada. Three female individuals with no history of cancer (unexposed) were matched by birth year and census subdivision to each patient with cancer (exposed). In a subset of the cohort (2005 onwards), the Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were further classified into two groups for analysis based on treatment exposure: (1) chemotherapy alone or (2) combined chemotherapy and radiation. Reproductive health outcomes were infertility, childbirth, and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). Relative risks (RR) were calculated using modified Poisson regression adjusted for income quintile, immigration status, and parity. RESULTS: A total of 1443 exposed and 4329 unexposed individuals formed our cohort. Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were at an increased risk of infertility (aRR 1.86; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.20) and POI (aRR 2.81; 95% CI 2.16 to 3.65). While the risk of infertility persisted in both treatment groups (chemotherapy alone, combined chemotherapy plus radiotherapy), the increased risk of POI was only statistically significant in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. No differences in childbirth rates were observed, overall or by treatment exposure compared with unexposed individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Female AYA survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma face an increased risk of infertility, independent of exposure to chemotherapy alone, or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. The risk of POI is higher in those requiring radiotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These results emphasize the importance of pre-treatment fertility counseling and reproductive health surveillance for AYAs diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cancer SurvivorshipSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207