Resolved‐detrimental surface crystallization in yttrium lanthanum gallate glasses for optical fiber applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gallium‐rich heavy metal oxide glasses have become highly attractive optical materials since they exhibit a wide transparency window spanning from the ultraviolet ∼270 nm up to the mid‐infrared (IR) region ∼6 μm making them promising for a future integration in optical fiber devices. Nonetheless, in most composition, surface crystallization is a key limiting factor for optical fiber drawing using the classical preform‐to‐fiber method. Herein, taking advantage of structural information from vibrational spectroscopies (Raman/IR) and 71 Ga Solid‐State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, we describe the key role of lanthanum and yttrium rare—earth elements on the glass structure and their impact on the capability to draw those new glass compositions into optical fibers. This approach emphasizes that yttrium ions as compared with lanthanum ones favor the glass disorder, increasing significantly the fraction of GaO 5 units with respect to GaO 4 . That, combined with thermal analysis and examination of the crystallization behaviors, highlights that Y 2 O 3 prevents the glass devitrification during the glass shaping. The smaller yttrium radius is believed to be the key physical parameter preventing the precipitation of the Ba y Ga 5‐y Ge y+1 La 3‐y O 14 ( y = 0, 1, 2, 3) langasite‐type crystal phase. This study remains particularly relevant and opens up the way for the development of highly robust power scaled fiber devices operating from the visible up to the challenging mid‐IR domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".