Outcomes of the arterial switch for transposition during infancy using a standardized approach over 30 years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the early and late outcomes of the arterial switch for transposition. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the early and late outcomes of arterial switch performed during infancy using a standardized institutional approach between 1988 and 2018, compared by morphological groups. RESULTS: A total of 749 consecutive patients undergoing arterial switch during infancy were included, 464 (61.9%) with intact septum, 163 (21.8%) with isolated ventricular septal defect and 122 (16.3%) with complex transposition with associated lesions, including 67 (8.9%) with Taussig-Bing anomaly. There were 34 early deaths [4.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-6.1] with only 10 (2.6%) early deaths since 2000. Complex morphology (odds ratio 11.44, 95% CI 4.76-27.43) and intramural coronary artery (odds ratio 5.17, 95% CI 1.61-15.91) were identified as the most important risk factors for 90-day mortality. Overall survival was 92.7% (95% CI 90.8-94.6) at 5 years and 91.9% (95% CI 89.9-94.1) at 20 years; in hospital survivors, there were 15 (2.1%) late deaths during a median follow-up of 13.7 years. Cumulative incidence of surgical or catheter reintervention was 16.0% (95% CI 14.5-17.5) at 5 years and 22.7% (95% CI 21.0-24.0) at 20 years; early and late reinterventions were more common in the complex group, with no difference between the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized approach, the arterial switch can be performed with low early mortality, moderate rates of reintervention and excellent long-term survival. Concomitant lesions were the most important risk factor for early death and were associated with increased risk of late reintervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".