Species divergence despite minimal morphological differentiation and habitat overlap in the <i>Patelloida saccharina</i> (Patellogastropoda: Lottiidae) species complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We describe the current state of speciation in the species complex of the marine gastropod Patelloida saccharina, using mitochondrial COI, 16S RNA, nuclear histone 3 gene and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers from 165 specimens collected from 37 localities across the Japanese archipelago. In total, 28 unique COI haplotypes, 16 16S haplotypes, 11 histone 3 haplotypes and 148 734 SNPs were obtained. Genetic assignments and phylogenetic trees recovered three genetically distinct lineages: P. saccharina saccharina, P. saccharina lanx and an unknown P. sp. from Shionomisaki, Wakayama Prefecture. The divergence between P. saccharina saccharina and P. saccharina lanx was estimated to have occurred around 44 000 years ago—too recent to have accumulated the morphological differences that have confounded taxonomic identification. Continuous gene exchange after an initial split is suggested based on demographic history analyses, which allowed for introgression of the P. saccharina lanx genome and the proliferation of intermediate individuals. Speciation, despite the existence of a contact zone in the Ryukyu Islands, possibly occurred due to the eventual reproductive isolation that followed the initial split with gene flow. Patelloida saccharina saccharina and P. saccharina lanx were strongly supported by our results as two separate species, and a revision of the current taxonomic descriptions based on their phylogeny, demographic history and species distribution is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".