MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376144032 · doi:10.54097/ehss.v13i.8187

The Significance of the Arts in the Canadian Education System

2023· article· en· W4376144032 on OpenAlexaffabout
Baixuan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsVisual arts educationArts in educationCurriculumValue (mathematics)SociologyPerforming arts educationMeaning (existential)PedagogyHigher educationState (computer science)Political sciencePsychologyLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arts education acts as a reinforcing link between politics and economics. The state of development of education is related to the various aspects of the operation of the state and society. The concept and role of the arts were reintroduced and then added to the educational system. In preschool, fundamental education, secondary and higher education, and art education provides guidance and shape the way of thinking and acting of students. Therefore, art education has become an integral part of the education system in many countries. Arts learning is a life experience that provides creative value for the subsequent development of personal and social life, including emotional value, economic transformation value, research development value, etc. This points to the education of arts education and technological development. The article describes the concept and meaning of arts education; the investment in arts education in Canada, including funding, curriculum approaches, teaching teams, extracurricular school resources, legal policies, and other aspects of investment and outcomes. The article is provided to help inform the Canadian art education system, to fill in the discussion of information and assessment of the phenomenon in Canadian arts classrooms, and to provide statistics and results on specific legal settings and funding streams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207