MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376224029 · doi:10.1152/physrev.00001.2023

The placenta: epigenetic insights into trophoblast developmental models of a generation-bridging organ with long-lasting impact on lifelong health

2023· review· en· W4376224029 on OpenAlexafffund
Myriam Hemberger, Wendy Dean

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Reviews · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryAlberta Children's Hospital FoundationGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPlacentationPlacentaTrophoblastBiologyEpigeneticsEpigenomeStem cellEmbryonic stem cellBioinformaticsFetusPregnancyNeurosciencePhysiologyCell biologyDNA methylationGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The placenta is a unique organ system that functionally combines both maternal and fetal cell types with distinct lineage origins. Normal placentation is critical for developmental progression and reproductive success. Although the placenta is best known for its nutrient supply function to the fetus, genetic experiments in mice highlight that the placenta is also pivotal for directing the proper formation of specific fetal organs. These roles underscore the importance of the placenta for pregnancy outcome and lifelong health span, which makes it essential to better understand the molecular processes governing placental development and function and to find adequate models to study it. In this review, we provide an overview of placental development and highlight the instructional role of the epigenome in dictating cell fate decisions specifically in the placental trophoblast cell lineage. We then focus on recent advances in exploring stem cell and organoid models reflecting the feto-maternal interface in mice and humans that provide much-improved tools to study events in early development. We discuss stem cells derived from the placenta as well as those artificially induced to resemble the placenta, and how they can be combined with embryonic stem cells and with endometrial cell types of the uterus to reconstitute the early implantation site. We then allude to the exciting prospects of how these models can be harnessed in biomedicine to enhance our understanding of the pathological underpinnings of pregnancy complications in a patient-specific manner, and ultimately to facilitate therapeutic approaches of tissue- and organ-based regenerative medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological ReviewsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207