Systematic Electrophysiological Study Prior to Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death are recognized complications in tetralogy of Fallot. Electrophysiological studies (EPS) before pulmonary valve replacement (PVR), the most common reintervention in tetralogy of Fallot, could potentially inform therapy to improve arrhythmic outcomes. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted to systematically assess EPS with programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with tetralogy of Fallot referred for PVR from January 2020 to December 2021. A standardized stimulation protocol was used across all centers. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled, mean age 39.2±14.5 years, 53.3% males. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was induced in 27 (22.5%) patients. When identifiable, the critical isthmus most commonly implicated (ie, in 90.0%) was between the ventricular septal defect patch and pulmonary annulus. Factors independently associated with inducible ventricular tachycardia were history of atrial arrhythmia (odds ratio, 8.56 [95% CI, 2.43-34.73]) and pulmonary annulus diameter >26 mm (odds ratio, 5.05 [95% CI, 1.47-21.69]). The EPS led to a substantial change in management in 23 (19.2%) cases: 18 (15.0%) had catheter ablation, 3 (2.5%) surgical cryoablation during PVR, and 9 (7.5%) defibrillator implantation. Repeat EPS 5.1 (4.8-6.2) months after PVR was negative in 8 of 9 (88.9%) patients. No patient experienced a sustained ventricular arrhythmia during 13 (6.1-20.1) months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Systematically performing programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with tetralogy of Fallot referred for PVR yields a high rate of inducible ventricular tachycardia and carries the potential to alter management. It remains to be determined whether a standardized treatment approach based on the results of EPS will translate into improved outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04205461; Unique identifier: NCT04205461.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".