MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376256304 · doi:10.1142/s2010326323500077

Matrix deviation inequality for ℓp-norm

2023· article· en· W4376256304 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRandom Matrices Theory and Application · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsGaussianLemma (botany)CombinatoricsRandom matrixMatrix normMatrix (chemical analysis)Norm (philosophy)Pure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsPhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the general matrix deviation inequality for i.i.d. ensemble Gaussian matrix [R. Vershynin, High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 2018), doi:10.1017/9781108231596 of Theorem 11.1.5], we show that this property holds for the [Formula: see text]-norm with [Formula: see text] and i.i.d. ensemble sub-Gaussian matrices, i.e. random matrices with i.i.d. mean-zero, unit variance, sub-Gaussian entries. As a consequence of our result, we establish the Johnson–Lindenstrauss lemma from [Formula: see text]-space to [Formula: see text]-space for all i.i.d. ensemble sub-Gaussian matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it