Persistence Length and Encounter Frequency Determination from Fluorescence Studies of Pyrene-Labeled Poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate)s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of nine pyrene-labeled poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate)s (Py-PEG n MAs) with n equal to 0–5, 9, 16, and 19 were prepared by random radical copolymerization of 1-pyrenebutyl methacrylate and nine different EG n MA monomers. The process of pyrene excimer formation (PEF) in the Py-PEG n MA samples was characterized in acetone, THF, toluene, N, N -dimethylformamide (DMF), dioxane, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The fluorescence decays of all Py-PEG n MA samples were acquired in the six solvents and analyzed with the fluorescence blob model (FBM) to yield the number N blob of structural units (SU) in the subvolume of the polymer coil probed by an excited pyrene and referred to as a blob, and the rate constant k blob describing the encounters between two SU bearing an excited and a ground-state pyrenyl label located inside a same blob. N blob and k blob remained constant with pyrene content for a same series of Py-PEG n MA samples. After averaging N blob and k blob over all pyrene contents for a same Py-PEG n MA series, ⟨ N blob ⟩ and the product ⟨ k blob × N blob ⟩ were found to decrease with increasing side chain length reflecting a progressive stiffening and decrease in the internal dynamics of the polymethacrylate backbone, respectively. ⟨ N blob ⟩ and ⟨ k blob × N blob ⟩ could be parametrized as a function of the molecular weight of an SU and the solvent viscosity. The parametrized form of ⟨ N blob ⟩ was applied to determine the persistence length ( l p ) of the PEG n MA samples using the Kratky–Porod equation. l p was found to increase linearly with the square of the side chain length of the PEG n MA samples, as expected theoretically. The parametrized form of ⟨ k blob × N blob ⟩ was used as a calibration curve against which the internal dynamics of several polypeptides and poly(methyl acrylate) could be compared in DMSO. This study illustrates the ability of PEF measurements to determine the persistence length and quantify the internal dynamics of polymers in solution, two important parameters in the characterization of macromolecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".