Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mystes reflects on the return of a Golden Age (2.23-25):1 Saturni rediere dies †redit Astraea certus † totaque in antiquos redierunt saecula mores.condit securas tota spe messor aristas.In a recent issue of this journal Boris Kayachev proposed to emend redit Astraea certus in v. 23 by writing rediit pia uirgo, and totaque in v. 24 by writing istaque.2It is reasonably clear that in both places the text is corrupt and wants correction.The two chief contenders for the place of redit Astraea certus are Gundermann's rediit Astraea, which expands redit by one minim and deletes the meaningless and hypermetrical certus altogether, and Kayachev's aforementioned rediit pia uirgo, upon which Astraea is presumed to have been a gloss.A difficulty into which both suggestions run is that of accounting for the appearance of certus at the end of the line.Gundermann and Schmid would take certos (it is unclear whether the MS reads this or certus) as a gloss upon antiquos mores in v. 24; but one struggles to find in certos a sense which a scribe might have thought could illustrate these words.3Kayachev, on the other hand, wonders whether certus might be a corruption of an original terris, which a scribe who thought redi(i)t Astraea scanned as ⏑ ⏑ | -⏑ ⏑ (redit Astrĕa, as spelled in the MS) perhaps interpolated to fill out the seemingly defective metre; but this theory assumes several steps which, though slight in themselves, in combination seem rather unlikely.If rediit pia uirgo were the correct reading, certus might, as Kayachev suggests, have been part of an original gloss Astraea
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".