COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR ALGORITHM ON VARIOUS INTRUSION DETECTION DATASETS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Security in computer networks can be vulnerable, this is because we have weaknesses in making security policies, weak computer system configurations, or software bugs. Intrusion detection is a mechanism for securing computer networks by detecting, preventing, and blocking illegal attempts to access confidential information. The IDS mechanism is designed to protect the system and reduce the impact of damage from any attack on a computer network for violating computer security policies including availability, confidentiality, and integrity. Data mining techniques have been used to obtain useful knowledge from the use of IDS datasets. Some IDS datasets that are commonly used are Full KDD, Corrected KDD99, NSL-KDD, 10% KDD, UNSW-NB15, Caida, ADFA Windows, and UNM have been used to get the accuracy rate using the k-Nearest Neighbors algorithm (k-NN). The latest IDS dataset provided by the Canadian Institute of Cybersecurity contains most of the latest attack scenarios named the CICIDS2017 dataset. A preliminary experiment shows that the approach using the k-NN method on the CICIDS2017 dataset successfully produces the highest average value of intrusion detection accuracy than other IDS datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".