MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376459373 · doi:10.1039/d3dt90080k

Contents list

2023· article· en· W4376459373 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal case studies and regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChangchun Institute of Applied ChemistryJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgUniversité de MontpellierNanjing UniversityKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyRuhr-Universität BochumUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoBrock UniversityTechnische Universität BraunschweigUppsala UniversitetUniversité de ToulouseNankai UniversityEast China Normal UniversityMonash UniversityIndian Institute of Science Education and Research MohaliHong Kong Baptist UniversityÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneUniversity of California, IrvineIndian Institute of Science Education and Research ThiruvananthapuramIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversity of TsukubaUniversity of OxfordRoyal Society of ChemistryRoyal SocietySuzhou UniversityWayne State UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonUniversität BaselHeriot-Watt UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of TorontoSouth China University of TechnologyUniversity College LondonHokkaido UniversityTexas State UniversityIndian Institute of ScienceOhio State University
KeywordsAcknowledgementAttributionChromatin structure remodeling (RSC) complexComputer scienceLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebChemistryComputer securityPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

not be liable for any resulting loss or damage arising as a result of reliance upon this material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9580.928

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicLegal case studies and regulationsFrench-language works237,207