MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376461139 · doi:10.1525/phr.2023.92.2.318

Review: <i>I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance</i>, by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks

2023· article· en· W4376461139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Historical Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationColonialismResistance (ecology)HistoryArt historyDownloadLibrary scienceComputer scienceArchaeologyWorld Wide WebEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| May 01 2023 Review: I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance, by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance. By Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks. (Winnipeg, University of Manitoba Press, 2022. 264 pp.) Kelly Tzoumis Kelly Tzoumis DePaul University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Pacific Historical Review (2023) 92 (2): 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2023.92.2.318 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Kelly Tzoumis; Review: I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance, by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks. Pacific Historical Review 1 May 2023; 92 (2): 318–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2023.92.2.318 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentPacific Historical Review Search I Will Live for Both of Us, by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks, is a first-person perspective on the experience of the Inuit people to colonialism and extraction of resources, particularly minerals and uranium mining. Scottie, senior co-author, provides a narrative history of her experience as an Inuit member, particularly in the voice of Inuit women, to the resistance of colonialism and what is now recognized as environmental injustices against her community. This book succeeds in achieving the seamless blend of solid historical documentation contributed by co-authors Bernauer and Hicks with the authentic voice of the community. Like many other environmental injustices against indigenous people, this is a detailed account of the resource extractions and legacy of mining that threaten a community. This book is part of a larger body of history and literature that illustrate how environmental justice communities are exploited not just of their natural resources... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it