MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376461420 · doi:10.15575/jim.v3i2.22303

PENGARUH UPAH TERHADAP TURNOVER INTENTION KARYAWAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY: STUDI KASUS PADA PT. HEGARMANAH LESTARI

2022· article· en· W4376461420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nabiela Rizki Alifa, Versanudin Hekmatyar

Bibliographic record

VenueKomitmen Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInventory turnoverBusinessBusiness administrationQuarter (Canadian coin)Textile industryProductivityTurnoverAgricultural scienceAsset (computer security)EconomicsManagementFinanceEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human capital is an important asset for the company and the presence of a high-productivity human capital plays an important role in the success of the company. Therefore, if a company has a high employee turnover rate, the company's performance can be disrupted. The Central Statistics Agency (BPS) reports that the textile industry contributed 6.56% to the non-oil and gas processing industry's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the second quarter of 2022. Work activity in the textile trading line has a relatively low level of turnover intention and this study is examined to validate the cause. This study aims to describe the effect of wages on employee turnover intention at PT Hegarmanah Lestari. Data was collected using a quantitative approach and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that there is a significant influence between wages on the turnover intention of PT Hegarmanah Lestari employees. In simple terms, it can be said that PT Hegarmanah Lestari has a relatively low level of turnover intention due to the implementation of wages according to established and generally accepted standards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKomitmen Jurnal Ilmiah ManajemenSame topicEmployee Performance and ManagementFrench-language works237,207