Bibliographic record
Abstract
x Tables 1.1 Classification of 153 Canadian studies from 2001 to 2006 1.2 Costs and effects for alternative gallstone treatments 1.3 Cost and effect per patient for worksite care and regular care 1.4 Detection rates for successive stool guaiac tests 1.5 Bednet usage in Kenya in the Millennium Village and in the MV region 1.6 Evaluation of neo-natal intensive care treatment 2.1 Short run production function for lengths of stay 2.2 Short run cost curves for lengths of stay 2.3 Long run production function for lengths of stay 2.4 Discount factors for alternative time horizons and interest rates 2.5 Avoidable costs in SEK of liver cirrhosis for women compared to base year, ten years 2.6 Reference requirements for five treatments (per 100 bed-days) 2.7 Costs and cost-effectiveness (C/E) for three live kidney donor transplant treatments 2.8 Inflation-controlled hospital costs for total knee arthroplasty 2.9 Total costs and cost profiles of 17 prevention interventions targeting CSWs in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh in India in 2002-03 2.10 Lifetime costs of HIV 2.11 Costs of different treatments before and after treatment 2.12 Costs of liver cirrhosis for women compared to base year, 24 years 3.1 Percentage of cases where RCC-estimated costs are within 10 percent of RVU-estimated costs 3.2 DATCAP costs from 110 substance abuse treatment programs 3.3 Estimates of economies of scope for Danish hospitals 3.4 DRGs that give different profitability outcomes using RVUs and RCCs 3.5 Resource based relative values and Medicare charges 3.6 Estimates of the share of the physician's bill that counts as costs 3.7 DATCAP costs for 302 clients and 440 client episodes 3.8 Human resource cost per chest X-ray films 3.9 Hypothetical translation of a patient's bill: charges to costs 3.10 Hypothetical use of cost centers 4.1 Consequences of increased taxes in consumer surplus loss to drinkers and lives saved 4.2 Literature estimates of costs and benefits on a comparable basis 4.3 Comparison of optimal and actual policies for schistomiasis 4.4 Effect of education of household members on health care outcomes (change in probabilities)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.814 | 0.442 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".