MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4376504845 · doi:10.1101/2023.05.12.540513

Fluctuation of lysosomal protein degradation in neural stem cells of postnatal mouse brain

2023· preprint· en· W4376504845 on OpenAlexaff
He Zhang, Karan Ishii, Tatsuya Shibata, Shunsuke Ishii, Marika Hirao, Lu Zhou, Risa Takamura, Satsuki Kitano, Hitoshi Miyachi, Ryoichiro Kageyama, Eisuke Itakura, Taeko Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsNeural stem cellAutophagyDentate gyrusHippocampal formationCell biologyLysosomeImmunostainingStem cellProtein degradationBiologyNeuroscienceIntracellularChemistryBiochemistryImmunohistochemistryImmunologyEnzymeApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lysosomes are intracellular organelles responsible for degrading diverse macromolecules delivered from several pathways, such as the endo-lysosomal and autophagic pathways. Recent reports have suggested that lysosomes are essential in regulating neural stem cells in developing, adult, and aged brains. However, the activity of these lysosomes has not yet been monitored in these brain tissues. Here, we report a new probe to measure lysosomal protein degradation in brain tissue by immunostaining. Our results demonstrate the fluctuation of lysosomal protein degradation in neural stem cells depending on age and brain disorder. Neural stem cells increase lysosomal activity during hippocampal development in the dentate gyrus, but aging and aging-related disease reduces their activity. In addition, physical exercise increases lysosomal activity in neural stem cells and astrocytes. We hypothesize three different stages of lysosomal activity: the increase in development, the stable state for the adult stage, and the reduction by damages with age or disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→