MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376508346 · doi:10.1080/15548627.2023.2210995

From jeopardy champion to drug discovery; semantic similarity artificial intelligence

2023· article· en· W4376508346 on OpenAlexafffund
Natalia Moskal, G. Angus McQuibban

Bibliographic record

VenueAutophagy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyChampionDrug discoveryComputational biologySemantic similaritySimilarity (geometry)Artificial intelligenceBioinformaticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have employed artificial intelligence to streamline the small molecule drug screening pipeline and identified the cholesterol-reducing compound probucol in the process. Probucol augmented mitophagy and prevented loss of dopaminergic neurons in flies and zebrafish challenged with mitochondrial toxins. Further dissection of the mechanism of action led to the identification of ABCA1, the target of probucol, as a mitophagy modulator. Probucol treatment regulates lipid droplet dynamics during mitophagy and ABCA1 is required for these effects. Here we will summarize the combination of in silico and cell-based screening that led us to identify and characterize probucol as a compound that enhances mitophagy and include thoughts about future directions for the topics explored in our study.Abbreviations: ABCA1: ATP binding cassette transporter protein 1; ATP: Adenosine tri-phosphate; CCCP: carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; DsRed: Discosoma red; FDA: Food and drug administration; GFP: Green fluorescent protein; LAMP: lysosome-associated membrane glycoproteins; LD: Lipid droplet; PD: Parkinson’s disease; PINK: PTEN-induced kinase

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutophagySame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207