Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plan of Care Sallie Fullerton (bio) The thing about the healingand the outlookand the hopeand all the otherlacunae of timewe swim along is that they relyon a combinationof desires and needsspottily placed—like marble, expensivebecause it exists only somewherefor some time. This medicine,the one that,like the doctoryou would havemaybe been,supports lifebut does notprovide its reason, this medicine,the one that you've drunkor veined and evensometimes bathed in, [End Page 91] is as goodon the shelfas it is in the spoonthe way a tanageris as good as caughtpeeking from a well-placedkitchen window. Leopardine drapesbelie whateverstratagem you were surewould save you,as if safety were everthe meridian,as if knowing and swallowingwere ever the hope in the throat.The theme of the liquid,watery but not water,is that you can'ttrace it. [End Page 92] Sallie Fullerton Sallie Fullerton is a recent graduate of the Iowa Writers' Workshop. Their work has appeared in Frontier Poetry, Vagabond City, and Bennington Review as well as Pathetic Literature, edited by Eileen Myles (Grove p, 2022). They are currently conducting research for a documentary-poetry project through a 2022–23 Fulbright Arts/Research Award in Montréal, Canada. Copyright © 2022 University of Nebraska Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.307 | 0.104 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".