MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376562349 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5285.1.4

The very rare Japanese endemic diving beetle Japanolaccophilus niponensis (Kamiya, 1939), (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Laccophilinae): larval morphology and phylogenetic comparison with other known Laccophilini

2023· article· en· W4376562349 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Alarie, Kohei Watanabe, Mariano C. Michat

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of Sudbury
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDytiscidaeBiologyLarvaZoologyMorphology (biology)Phylogenetic treePhylogeneticsEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The three larval instars of Japanolaccophilus niponensis (Kamiya, 1939) (Coleoptera: Adephaga, Laccophilinae) are described for the first time according to the now genevralized larval descriptive format of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera: Adephaga), which incorporates detailed chaetotaxic and morphometric analyses. A parsimony analysis based on larval characteristics of 14 Laccophilini species in seven genera was conducted using the program TNT. One of the main results is that Japanolaccophilus Satô, 1972, which so far was treated as being related to Neptosternus Sharp, 1882 now stands out as sister to Laccophilus Leach, 1815, and Philodytes J. Balfour-Browne, 1938 with strong support. Additionally, Laccomimus Toledo & Michat, 2015, and Africophilus Guignot, 1948 are resolved as monophyletic and sister to a clade which itself is subdivided into two well supported clades: Neptosternus + Australphilus Watts, 1978, and Japanolaccophilus + (Laccophilus, Philodytes). Philodytes is here newly accepted as junior synonym of Laccophilus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207