Semi-automatic 3D reconstruction of middle and inner ear structures using CBCT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a semi-automatic reconstruction approach of middle and inner ear structures using generic 3D deformable surface models from Cone Beam CT (CBCT) examination. First, the user must position a set of control points in the CBCT volume for each of the 4 structures of the inner and middle ear. These points are used to position the deformable surface models and to customize them so that they are as close to the boundaries as possible. Finally, each mesh is refined iteratively segmenting the limits of the structure while taking into account neighbouring structures as boundary constraints. Our method is tested on left and right ears of 20 scans of patients analysed retrospectively. The results show the efficiency and reliability of this approach with an average Dice Similarity Coefficient of 91.8% for the inner ear model and 89.9% for the ossicular chain and a total reconstruction time of 5 minutes. The implementation of our method in a clinical setting could provide clinicians with distinct and accurate 3D models of the ear structures without requiring a tedious manual segmentation step, in order to give them a better understanding of the auditory system in vivo and help them in diagnosis and follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".