Development of the ethmoid in a wallaby and implications for the homology of turbinal elements in marsupials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The homologies of the turbinals (scroll bones) of the ethmoid are not well understood, including the potential implication for understanding mammalian phylogeny. Here we examine the postnatal development of this anatomical system in a marsupial mammal because previous work has shown that the adult pattern of five endoturbinals (ethmoturbinals) and two ectoturbinals (frontoturbinals) is conserved. Furthermore, marsupial phylogeny is fairly well resolved and provides a solid evolutionary framework for examining turbinal homologies. In this study, we documented the development of the ethmoid of the tammar wallaby, Notamacropus eugenii, using histology and computed tomography imagery of a growth series of pouch young. The pattern of development of the turbinal elements in the wallaby was compared to that in didelphids, as described in previous work. We found that four ethmoturbinals initially develop, followed later in development by an interturbinal; these five elements then develop into the bony endoturbinals found in adults. These data support the idea that endoturbinal III, derived from an interturbinal, has a distinctive development pattern from the other endoturbinals. This is consistent with what is seen in the didelphid marsupials, Caluromys philander and Monodelphis domestica, suggesting this is a common developmental pattern for marsupials. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The mammalian skull: development, structure and function’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".