Bibliographic record
Abstract
24-hour economy' 217 35-hour working week in France 215 A Caring World (OECD) 174, 181-3, 195 Aboriginal Head Start, Canada 38 achievement and enjoyment 165 activation policy, European Union 29-30, 117, 118 activities, targeted, for children 231 adult learners 34 adults-in-the-making, children 177-8 'adult worker model' 10, 228 after-school care, Nordic countries 98 ageing populations in European Union 43, 128 Alliance for the Family, Germany 221, 235, 237 annual working hours in UK 252 antisocial behaviour 37, 38, 53, 119 Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 38, 55 asset ownership 39 asylum seekers' children in UK 60, 116 Aubry Laws, France 205 Australia, child poverty rates 87 Austria, child poverty rates 87 authoritarianism 55 autonomy of child 230 'average' child benefit package 81, 82 Babies and Bosses (OECD) 142-4, 174, 181-90, 95-6 babysitting service 188 Belgium child poverty rates 87 working hours for men and women 277 benefits in kind 113 for children 110 Bertelsmann Foundation, Germany 221, 235 birth rates, falling 2, 3, 12, 43 Europe 129 Germany 221 births outside marriage 4, 6 Blair, Tony 33, 38, 164 on children as future 52 parental leave 268 breadwinner and carer 211 male 5 breadwinner model in Germany 221 Britain, social investment 39, 40 Brown, Gordon on child poverty 39, 52-3 on 'worklessness' 33 businesses with childcare facilities, France 216 call centre work in UK 250, 253 Campaign 2000 47 Canada child poverty rates 87 social investment, parents and children 37, 39 social policy 33, 34, 35 Canada Child Tax Benefit 46 Canada Savings Education Grant 39 care 55 and education, distinction 168 employment and 137-53 informal 42 in liberal regimes 169 private responsibility 169 care allowances 97-8 career ambitions 224 Career and Family Audit, Germany 235-7 care insurance, Germany 221 care provision and women 177 care role of mothers 173 care services, non-parental 55, 177 care sharing 126 297
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.812 | 0.679 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".