Validation of a microwave energy meter to non-lethally estimate energetic reserves in adult sturgeon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Whole-body (WB) energetic reserves influence fish survival, growth, and reproduction but are typically quantified using lethal methods (i.e. proximate analyses) or interpreted through body condition indices. Energetic reserves can impact population dynamics through influences on growth rates, age-at-first-reproductive-maturity, and spawning periodicity at the individual-fish level, especially in long-lived sturgeon species. Therefore, a non-lethal tool to track the energetic reserves of endangered sturgeon populations could inform adaptive management and further our understanding of the sturgeon’s biology. The Distell Fatmeter is a microwave energy meter that has been validated to non-lethally estimate energetic reserves in some fish species, but never successfully for sturgeon. Here, stepwise linear regressions were applied to test commonly monitored body metrics and Fatmeter measurements at nine different anatomical sites on captive adult pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus; total length of 790–1015 mm; WB lipid of 13.9–33.3%) compared with WB lipid and energy content determined by proximate analyses. Fatmeter measurements alone explained approximately 70% of the variation in WB energetic reserves, which outperformed models considering body metrics alone by a margin of approximately 20%. The top-ranked models based on AICc score (second-order Akaike Information Criterion) included a combination of body metrics and Fatmeter measurements and accounted for up to 76% of the variation in WB lipid and energy. We recommend the incorporation of Fatmeter measurements at a single site located dorsally to the lateral scutes at the posterior end of the fish above the pelvic fins (U-P) into conservation monitoring programs for adult pallid sturgeon (total length [TL] ≥ 790 mm; fork length [FL] ≥ 715 mm) and the cautious application of Fatmeter measurements for sturgeon between 435 and 790 mm TL (375–715 mm FL). Measurements at this U-P site combined with body mass explained approximately 75% of the variation in WB lipid and energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".